This may need a new blog post, but I’ll put the details here. If I could use one word to describe the quality it would be: Poor.
Since writing this a few months ago, I ordered a few more prints for a couple of customers. Unfortunately, I was not impressed at all with the quality. Rather, I was “underwhelmed.”
- The quality sucked and overall I was just not happy.
- The highlights were blown out losing subtle details. I use the same computer and have no issues at other printers.
- They put a thin wooden backing on the canvas making it hard and ugly. Why not a nice black paper backing?
- The canvas itself is not stretched on the frame improperly. I used a sharpie to clean it.
- The ink flecks when you lightly scrape it on something.
On one in which I ordered a dust cover, it was a 1/8″ thick particle board backing nailed to the frame. It was the wrong size as it was 1/4″ wider than the print. I expected the nice thick black paper but instead received this hideous looking brown particle board piece of crap.
But the old saying goes: You get what you pay for. And I paid little so I got little quality.
Partial Solar Eclipse: Lost Details
ORIGINAL POST: A few weeks ago a gentleman from Canvas Champ printing company contacted me to see if I wanted a free canvas print. Jainam asked if I wanted to critique the company’s quality and if so, I’d get a free 16×20 inch canvas print. Hell, why not I thought.
A free canvas print and in exchange for a critique of the workmanship. I love stuff like this. Earlier, I had the same thing happen but with a Think Tank City Walker 20 camera bag. Beautiful bag. Love it and still use it to this day. You can read more here: Not Just for City Slickers: the Think Tank City Walker 20 Shoulder Bag.
The Image – Dad at the King Tut Exhibit:
So I sent them a file of my father-in-law Todd I shot while we were at the King Tut Exhibit at the Pacific Science Center in Seattle, Wash. My wife Heidi says it’s her favorite photo of him and since he died in December, we wanted something nice. How serendipitous since we were wanting to make a large print for our wall.
I emailed the image to Canvas Champ and within 3 days received an email stating my print was on its way with expected delivery in 7 days. And it was coming from India. Pretty impressive.
The Print – Front:
Upon arrival, I inspected the packaging for signs of damage. None. Happy with that, I opened it. It was packaged pretty well. Good, clean packaging.
When I finally unwrapped the print, I was at first amazed by the construction. Strong, sturdy, and it had a foam insert to help strengthen the print and frame. The canvas is wrapped tight around the birch wood frame, the corner folds were tight, and the quality is superb.
The Print – Back:
At first, the image looked pretty good. However, I think the highlights were a little blown out. This could be the difference in monitors, mismatched color profiles, or an uncalibrated prints. As CC said to me they calibrate the printers daily, it leaves too reasons why: my profile didn’t translate to what they use or the printers don’t bring the image up and do some rudimentary toning.
The blacks and midtones are wonderful. Deep rich blacks with great contrast and color in the midtones. The image quality overall is acceptable.
Some of the things I noticed how you needed to hang the picture. It has two hangers that don’t allow you any error when mounting it on the wall. If you’re off a tad, you have to pull on of the nails or hooks out and redo it. A pain if you ask me. Not everyone has a laser level to make sure a level mount. You need to have room for error. There needs to be a better way to mount it. Perhaps a sawtooth hanger such as what Bay Photo or White House Custom Colour provide for their canvas prints.
Another is that the back is open which exposes the foam and a lack of felt tabs. Canvas prints I had made at either Bay and WHCC have a black lining covering the back. A combination of that plus the foam insert would be great. It was also missing felt tabs which keep it from scratching the wall if the artwork is moved.
The Print – Corner Close-up:
One of the things that I find slightly annoying is how the corners are folded. The edge of the canvas shows and is white against the black printing. This is alleviated by simply using a different folding technique. I could easily do it with a sharpie, but if I’m going to spend money on a print, I’d like to be able to hang it without filling in exposed white canvas with a sharpie.
Canvas Champ says they use archival inks on giclée Epson printers. In an email about ink types and whether they tone the images to match the profile of the printers, they only said they calibrate the printers daily. I know through personal experience both Bay Photo and WHCC convert the embedded color profile and then tone, if needed, to match the output of the printer to make sure the best quality print.
Canvas Champ added that the styrofoam insert is NOT archival but they have not had any issues of outgassing ruining the image. Of course, one must take into account that canvas printing is a relatively new technology. The did reiterate their 99 year “No Questions Asked” warranty
Close-up of Staples and Mount:
The frame is constructed out of birch wood which uses stainless steel nails in the frame construction and stainless steel staples to mount the canvas to the frame. The styrofoam insert is glued to the back of the canvas and the frame to add overall strength.
Comparing the cost of getting a 16×20 canvas print:
|White House Custom Color||$41.50 and up|
|Bay Photo Lab||$95 and up|
CC does have a cost edge over Bay and WHCC. Their lower price makes getting some of my landscape images printed even more enticing.
The Back of a Bay Photo Lab Canvas print:
Notice on the back of the Bay Photo Lab print how nice it looks compared to the Canvas Champ. If CC were to implement this backing in addition to the foam insert, they will have one great product.
On a scale of 1 to 10, I’d give this particular print a 8. Mainly it loses points on the exposed corner, exposed backing, and difficult mounts. Overall I believe this to be a fairly decent product. In fact, Canvas Champ has an “99 year guarantee on all products , so at any time you feel the canvas is sagging , you can just return it for a new canvas with same image . No questions asked.” as said to me in an email.
But, to better judge their quality, I’m going to buy a few more canvas prints using a different name. You can’t really judge by one photo, especially one that is given to you for a product review.
So to sum up:
What I liked:
– Rich blacks
– Good midtones
– Overall construction
– Reasonable cost.
What I didn’t like and can be fixed:
– Bad corners due to poor construction technique.
– Exposed foam back and staples (cover it with a black backing to clean it up). More of trim issue, but still needed.
– No felt tabs to prevent scratching your wall. Yes, you can buy these at a hardware store, but it should be covered in the manufacturing.
– The blown out highlights. Color correct before printing.
– Mounting option as shipped. Using a wire or the sawtooth hangers would work best as opposed the current option.
Below is a little company info I was emailed:
“Owned by Design print banners LLC , Canvas Champ is an US owned company with headquarters based in Atlanta. CC also owns a couple of other websites (bannerbuzz.com , bannerbuzz.com.au , bannerbuzz.co.uk , bestofsigns.com ) which serve Australia , United kingdom and Canada . The company has 45 employees and we have a joint printing capacity of more than 20,000 sq ft per day.”
Also according the email, they print 20,000 sq. ft. of photos per day. That’s an astonishing 18,702 11x14s!!! That’s a lot!
For a better understanding of their product, visit their site at Canvas Champ Printing.
Thank you for stopping by to read and view my work. Feel free to comment, critique, or just ask questions.
Also, feel free to share and reblog, link to, and add your site in the comment section. Don’t forget to sign up for updates so you don’t miss on other postings with tips and tricks to improve your photography.
Paul “pablo” Conrad
Follow me on these various Social Networks:
- Instagram: @PaulConradPhotography
- Twitter: @pabloconrad
- Facebook: Paul Conrad Photography
- Pinterest: Paul Conrad Photography
Paul Conrad is a talented and skilled award-winning photographer living in Bellingham north of Seattle, WA, in the Pacific Northwest. His work has been published in newspapers and magazines throughout the United States and in Europe. He is available for assignments anywhere in the Pacific Northwest. Although his specialty is photojournalism covering news, sports, and editorial portraits, he also is skilled in family portraiture, high school senior portraits, and weddings.
His clients include Getty Images, Wire Image, AirBnB, The Bellingham Herald, and many local business in Whatcom County. Previous clients are Associated Press, the New York Times, L.A. Times, Denver Post, Rocky Mountain News, and many others.